7, ఫిబ్రవరి 2012, మంగళవారం

Besides the 122 telecom licenses cancelled by the Supreme Court, another 51 telecom licenses deserved to be cancelled


Cancellation of 122 telecom licenses by the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment dated 02-02-2012 in  Centre for public interest litigation and others Vs Union of India,   quashed  122 telecom licenses granted in 2008 along with consequent allocation of spectrum, after declaring them illegal.  These 122 licenses thus quashed are—( a)Uninor=22; Sistema Shyam(MTS)=21; Loop Telecom=21; Videocon=21; Etisalat=15; Idea(Idea and Spice)=13; S-Tel=6; Tata Teleservices(DoCoMo)=3. (Note---the telecom operators have to take license for each circle separately and hence if 22 licenses are cancelled, it means in 22 circles the license of the company is cancelled)

Same illegality involved in the case of another 51 telecom licenses

But the same illegality was involved in the granting of a total 51 licenses and spectrum during the period 2002 to 2007. In this, 26 licenses were granted by the NDA Government during 2004 January to May and 25 were granted by the UPA government during June 2004 to March 2007.
Reasons for cancellation of the 122 licenses  issued in 2008

The Supreme Court has quashed the 122 licenses and consequent spectrum allotment, on the following grounds:

a)      The State should follow constitutional principles including the doctrine of equality and larger  public  good while allocating the natural resources like spectrum.

b)      The First –Come- First- Served(FCFS) policy for allocating the licenses and spectrum lacks transparency and provides scope to the person having the access to the Minister/Officers to know in advance and apply immediately and thus gain undue advantage. Allotting natural resources like spectrum in this manner is against the constitutional principles including the doctrine of equity and larger public good.

c)       The allotment of spectrum in 2008 was done without consulting the Finance Ministry, on the basis of the price decided in 2001. It  was violation of the decision of the Council of Ministers taken on 31-10-2003, as per which the price of the spectrum has to be decided by the DoT in consultation with the Finance Ministry.(Note—in 2001, on the basis of bidding, the 4th cellular operators were allotted pan India spectrum for Rs 1651 crore entry fee)

d)      Such consultation with the Finance Ministry for deciding the price of the spectrum was absolutely necessary as  per the Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961.


e)      Even this wrong policy of First-Come-First-Served was further changed by the then Communications  Minister by announcing the change in the last date for receipt of the applications for licenses from 1-10-2007 to 25-9-2007, on 10-1-2008. This enabled some of the applicants who had access to the Minister or the DoT officers to get the eligibility conditions for the license fulfilled in advance and thereby getting the seniority in the First-Come-First-Served system for grant of license and spectrum.

The illegalities involved in the issuing of 51 licenses and linked spectrum during 2004 to 2007

It is to be noted that the same illegal principle of FCFS (First Come First Served) was followed in allotting the 51 licenses and the spectrum during the period 2004 to 2007 and the entry fee found by auction in 2001 was decided as the entry fee for these licenses also. It was decided without consulting the Finance Ministry, which was violation of the Council of Ministers decision dated 31-10-2003 and violation of the Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961 as per which such consultation was absolutely necessary. Therefore these 51 licences along with allotment of spectrum deserve to be cancelled due to their illegality.

The issue  of the illegality of these 51 licenses was not questioned before the Supreme Court

But the Supreme Court did not cancel these 51 licenses because no body questioned about these licenses before the Court. In fact, the Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 2-2-2012 observed,  “The   argument   of   Shri   Harish   Salve,   learned   senior   counsel,   that   if   the Court finds that the exercise undertaken for grant of UAS Licenses has resulted in   violation   of   the   institutional   integrity,   then   all   the   licences   granted   2001 onwards should  be  cancelled  does not deserve   acceptance  because   those  who have got license between 2001 and 24.9.2007 are not parties to these petitions and legality of the licences granted to them has not been questioned before this Court.”

Brief on the facts establishing the illegality

To understand this issue further, it is necessary to look at  the fact that while allotting the license to the 4th Cellular Operator in 2001, the procedure of bidding was followed and the price of pan India spectrum was discovered as Rs 1651 crore on that basis. Subsequently the question of allotting further licenses and spectrum came up for discussion. The TRAI, in its recommendations dated 27-10-2003 has recommended for multi stage bidding procedure for issuing  further  licenses, as was done in the case of 4th cellular operator licenses and based on the recommendations. On 31-10-2003 the Cabinet decided that the DoT and Ministry of Finance would discuss and finalize the spectrum pricing formula. As per the Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, no Department shall issue any orders which may, inter alia, involve any abandonment of revenue or otherwise have a financial bearing whether involving expenditure or not. Therefore consultation with the Finance Ministry for deciding the spectrum price was absolutely necessary.  It is to be noted that as per the provisions of the Constitution of India, vide Article 14, 19(g) and 21, any procedure adopted for issuance of licenses should be fair, transparent, in public interest and thee selection criteria must be free from ambiguity.

Violation of the statutory provisions and Constitutional obligations

But ignoring all these statutory requirements and procedures, the DoT, during the regime of NDA, decided in November 2003 to issue licenses and allot spectrum based on the illegal FCFS principle with the entry fee kept at the level of the price discovered in the bidding held in 2001 and ignoring the statutory obligation of discussion with the Finance Ministry for deciding the price. Even these decisions were not made public by any notification. 

Original sin committed by NDA and it was continued by UPA

Thus the original sin was committed by the NDA regime lead by the BJP and it was continued further with more distortion, by the UPA regime lead by the Congress Party. Now the Congress and the BJP are blaming each other as the thief. The fact is that both are responsible for these irregularities and illegalities. It is to be noted that although they blame each other as responsible for thee illegalities in the issuing of telecom licenses and spectrum, they never demanded for cancellation of these illegal licenses and spectrum allotments. It is because both of them represent the interests of the big capitalists of India who are increasingly collaborating with the foreign big capitalists to loot India. It is also to be noted that the media owned by the big capitalists never projected this demand for cancellation of these illegal licenses.

Cancel the 51 licenses also in addition to the 122 licenses

There cannot be two sets of criteria for cancellation of licenses. Since these telecom licenses and spectrum issued after 2001 and before 2008 suffer from the same illegalities as those issued in 2008, all these licenses deserve to be cancelled.

Nationalization is the only solution

Even if all these licenses are cancelled and the spectrum thus available has to be auctioned, it may be possible for the private telecom operators to form a cartel to see that the price discovered in the auction would be very less. Whatever may be the method of allocation, the big capitalists will find the way to see that they pay very less for the spectrum. The only solution is nationalization of the private telecom companies.







కామెంట్‌లు లేవు:

కామెంట్‌ను పోస్ట్ చేయండి