7, డిసెంబర్ 2011, బుధవారం

Relaxation in qualifying marks in promotion exams for for SC/ST employees-Whether properly implemented in BSNL?


The SC/ST employees were granted relaxation in qualifying marks in the promotion exams as per the DoP&T(Department of Personnel & Training)  Orders No. 8/12/69-Estt(SCT) dated 23-12-1970, No. 36021/10/76-Estt(SCT) dated 21.1.1977 and para 6.3.2 of the DPC guidelines contained in Department of Personnel and Training’s OM No. 22011/5/86-Estt(D) dated 10-4-1989.


The DoP&T order dated 23-12-1970 decided that in promotions/confirmations made through departmental competitive exams , the SC/ST candidates who have not acquired the general qualifying standards in such exams could also be considered for promotions/confirmations. In other words the qualifying standards in these examinations could be relaxed in favour of the SC/ST candidates in keeping with the criteria mentioned in the O.M No. 1/1/70-Estt(SCT) dated 25th July 1970.

 In the said 25th July 1970 order it was stated that as per the OM No. 8/10/66-Estt ( C)  dated 15th May 1967 read with OM No. 16/17/67-Estt (C )  dated 8-2-1968, when the vacancies of SC/ST category remain unfilled  , the selecting authorities were given discretion to select the SC/ST candidates who appeared in the direct recruitment examination  even if they did not get the qualifying marks, provided that such authorities are satisfied that  the minimum standard necessary for maintenance of the administration has been reached in their cases.

Thereafter it was stated in the said order dated 25-7-1970, that it was decided that if sufficient number of SC/ST candidates were not available on the basis of the general standard to fill up all the vacancies reserved for them, in such case the SC/ST candidates be taken by relaxed standard to make up the deficiency in the reserved posts, subject to the fitness of these candidates for appointment to the posts in question.

 Thus the condition that such relaxation in standards  in the competitive exams should be subject to the satisfaction of the selecting authority regarding the reaching of the minimum standard by the candidates was removed. In its place it was decided that such relaxation in standards was to be given to any extent, subject to the fitness of these candidates for appointment to the posts in question.

 Subsequently another clarification was issued vide OM No.36021/10/76-Estt (SCT) dated 21st January 1977 as per which the relaxed standards for SC/ST candidates are applicable in case of qualifying exams also held for promotion. The extent of such relaxation should however be decided on each occasion whenever such examination was held taking into account all relevant factors including (i) the number of vacancies reserved (ii) the performance of SC/ST candidates as well as general candidates in that examination (iii) the overall strength of the cadre and that of the SC/ST candidates in that cadre.

The DoT, based on the above orders of DoP&T issued orders vide No. 26-2/81-SPB-I dated 4/5/81 as per which the failed SC/ST candidates could be awarded grace marks  in both the competitive and qualifying exams without any limit for filling up the unfilled vacancies. Subsequently it issued another order vide No. 22-5/91-NCG dated 30-11-92 that the results of the SC candidates who got 20% marks and ST candidates who got 15% marks could be reviewed. This order is in violation of the DoP&T order dated 23-12-1970 read together with the Order dated 25-7-1970 as per which there was no minimum marks  were prescribed for for extending the benefit of relaxation in qualifying marks. But even these standards were  further tightened  in BSNL for the examinations for promotion to executive posts like JTO and JAO, for unknown reasons.

However, these orders were withdrawn by the DoP&T vide its order No. 36012/23/96-Estt(Res) dated 22nd July 1997  on the basis of  the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of  S. Vinod Kumar Vs. Union of IndiaSupreme Court, in its judgment in the case of S.Vinod Kumar Vs. Union of India. Consequent to the 82nd amendment of the Constitution allowing such relaxations, the DoP&T, vide its order No. 36012/23/96-Estt.(Res)-Vol.II dated 3-10-2000, has restored all these relaxations as per these rules.

But after the formation of the BSNL, the relaxations to be given in the qualifying marks for the SC/ST  candidates in the competitive exams for promotions  were not properly implemented. In the competitive examinations, where as no minimum marks were prescribed by the DoP&T orders for extending the benefit of relaxation in qualifying marks, the BSNL fixed higher level of minimum marks, thereby denying the benefit of relaxation. Similarly in the qualifying examinations for promotions, the relaxations were implemented for SC/ST officials  more stringently than what was required by thee conditions laid in the DoP&T orders.

From a reading of the above said DoP&T orders  and their implementation in BSNL, it appears that the relaxation in qualifying marks for SC/ST officials in promotional exams is not properly implemented in BSNL, thereby depriving the benefit to the SC/ST officials.

But whether there are any other orders supporting the stand taken by BSNL?  Further study will be made to find out the fact.

---P.Asokababu

6, డిసెంబర్ 2011, మంగళవారం

6th December 2011—55th death anniversary of Babasaheb Dr B.R.Ambedkar


Dr B.R.Ambedkar  (14/12/1891 to 06/12/1956) was the architect of the Indian Constitution. He dedicated his life for the upliftment of dalits and other oppressed sections of the society. Today, on the occasion of his 55th death anniversary, it is proper to remember what he said about the necessity of transforming the political independence achieved in India in 1947 into economic independence and social independence after 1947. He sai that this transformation was necessary for the betterment of the conditions  of the dalits and the exploited sections in the country. He said:

On the 26th of January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of contradictions. In politics we will have equality and in social and economic life we will have inequality. In politics, we will be recognising the principle of one man-one vote and one vote-one value. In our social and economic life, we shall by reason of our social and economic structure, continue to deny the principle of one man-one value.


“How long shall we continue to live this life of contradictions? How long shall we continue to deny equality in our social and economic life?”

The political democracy has been not yet transformed into social and economic independence. The achievement of social independence i.e freedom from caste oppression depends finally on the achievement of economic independence. This means there should be a radical change in the rural economic relations. At present the dalits in rural areas are mostly deprived of land and hence economic independence. On the other hand the land is concentrated among a few in the upper castes. This is the basis of social discrimination and caste oppression. Therefore unless this situation is changed, there cannot be a real economic and social independence. To bring this change, re-distribution of land through land reforms is required.

But since the present state is the state controlled by Capitalists and landlords, such real land reforms and redistribution of land is not possible. The only solution offered for upliftment of the dalits is reservation in government jobs and some allotments in the budgets. While these steps help in upliftment of some individuals who got the job, it is not enough to uplift the vast masses of dalits. It requires the struggle to change the land relations in the rural areas. Such a struggle cannot be successful by the struggle of dalits alone. It requires the unity of all those having no property in the rural areas irrespective of their caste and support from the poor and middle class peasants.

After the advent of liberalisation policies, there is almost no additional recruitment in Government jobs. Hence the chance of getting Government jobs through reservations has become very less for the dalits. Therefore the ruling classes are calculatedly creating quarrels among the dalits(on the basis of their sub castes)  and between  the dalits and other oppressed classes on the issue of share in the government jobs in order to disrupt the unity among all oppressed classes to fight against these liberalisation and privatisation policies.

Hence unless the struggle against caste oppression is linked with the struggle against class oppression and with the unity of the working class, both struggles will fail. Hence the working class struggles and the struggles against caste oppression should go together in order to fulfil the dream of Babasaheb Ambedkar for achieving the economic independence and political independence for the dalits and oppressed classes.

5, డిసెంబర్ 2011, సోమవారం

A Quotation From Karl Marx


“We develop new principles for the world out of the world’s own principles. We do not say to the world: Cease your struggles, they are foolish; We will give you the true slogan of struggle. We merely show the world what it is really fighting for, and consciousness is some thing that it has to acquire, even if it does not want to.”

The above is the quotation from the letter written by Karl Marx to his friend Arnold Ruge in 1843.
The meaning is that any new ideology, if it is to be correct and useful for changing the world for the better, has to be based on the laws governing the world. You cannot solve the problems of the world simply by saying forget the problems, cease the struggles and have mental peace. It is not possible to be away from the activity and the struggle going on in the world. You cannot escape from it except in illusion, which can be only temporary.


 The struggles will always be there and you cannot be on both sides of the struggles or you cannot wish away the struggles. You will find yourself compulsorily even if you do not wish, on this or that side of the struggle. Change for the better or for the worse is the result of the struggle. You can be on the better side (progressive side) of the struggle for changing the world for the better or you can be on the reactionary side of the struggle for making the world worse. There is no third road or no third possibility. If you say that you want to keep away from the struggle, then you will be automatically supporting that side  of the struggle that leads to worsening of the situation. You can change the world for the better when you understand the world correctly, when you understand thee laws governing the changes in the world.

You are in BSNL. There is a struggle going on in telecom sector whether you like it or not. Therre are forces interested in strengthening BSNL. There are forces interested in destroying the BSNL. You cannot say you are above this struggle. If you say you are not interested in this struggle, it will help the forces interested in destroying the BSNL and thus automatically you are on that side that wants destruction of BSNL. Moreover your future as BSNL employee or as BSNL retire depends on the future of BSNL and on which side wins in the struggle. You can win when you understand the nature and the laws of the struggle and the meaning of the struggle, and by taking the progressive side of the struggle which wants strengthening of BSNL.






United Nation’s Remedy for Solving Global Economic Downturn


Yesterday (3/12/2011) I have posted in the blog some extracts from the report of the United Nations on “World Economic Situation and Prospects 2012”. As per this report, USA and European countries and Japan (developed countries) are in no growth or low growth stage and there may be another economic recession soon. The Governments in Europe are facing debt crisis and unable to serve their debts. In USA the Government debt reached equal to the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) and it is still not dangerous. The unemployment is severe in USA and European countries. This situation has affected the developing countries like China, India etc and their growth rate also is slowing down.

In the name of coming out of the “debt crisis” of the Governments, the Governments in Europe are resorting to austerity measures i.e reducing Governemnt jobs, reducing salaries of Government employees, pension cuts, cuts in other social security benefits and other benefits of the people. In the USA also, where the debt of the Government is not as serious as in Europe, the Government is implementing austerity measures. As a result of this situation of severe unemployment coupled with cuts in the existing benefits, there is severe unrest in these countries resulting in several strikes and struggles.

The United Nations, in its above cited report suggested the following measures to avoid another recession and to come out of this situation of no growth or low growth:

a)      Governments not in serious debt crisis should take more debt and use it for infrastructure development and employment creation.

b)      Governments should avoid austerity measures like wage cut, pension cut, cuts in social security benefits etc since it will lead to further reduction in the demand thereby creating recession.

c)      An international mechanism has to be created for helping the countries facing serious debt crisis and also to stabilise the finances.

This is a good proposal. But it is not likely to be implemented by the Governments of USA or Europe. It is because these Goveernments are controlled by the financial capital which is not interested in the growth of the economy, but only interested in getting quick profits in share market gambling and other unproductive activities. In fact the debt crisis of the Governmeents in USA and European countries is only due to the gambling of this financial capital. In the housing loan gambling in USA, and other countries these financial institutions became bankrupt and the Governments were compelled to bail out them by paying astronomical sums to them from their budgets. These bail out packages coupled with the expenditures incurred on welfare measures to the people resulted in the debt crisis for the Governments.

To come out of this situation, it is necessary either to cut back the bail out given to the big private financial institutes or to cut the expenditure on welfare measures. For the financial capital dominating the Governments, crisis means the crisis to them only and solving the crisis means continuing the bailout to them. Hence it compels the Governments to cut the welfare benefits of the people to reduce the Governments’ debt burden. The finance capital insists the Governments to implement fiscal responsibility by cutting the welfare of the people. But for the working people, crisis means unemployment, cuts in salaries, pensions and welfare measures. Therefore to solve the crisis of the finance capital, Governments in USA and Europe are resorting to create crisis for the people.

The UPA Government in India, in the name of second generation reforms, is going ahead to create the same crisis for the people of India. It wants to provide more and more opportunities to this bankrupt international financial capital in various sectors in India. Opening retail sector for FDI, efforts for increasing FDI in various sectors etc are part of these reforms. Because of its dependence on Left Parties, the UPA-I Government could not implement such reforms in a considerable manner. The UPA-II Government is not depending on Left Parties and hence it is now going on full steam to implement the reforms favouring international finance capital at the cost of the people of India. The strengthening of the links of India with this international financial capital will lead to similar recession and slow growth as happening in USA and Europe and will result in untold miseries to the people.

Therefore it is necessary for the working class and the people in USA or Europe or India to fight against this domination of the financial capital and to compel the Governments to implement social sector and infrastructure projects necessary for creation of jobs and for boosting the demand. In America and Europe the Governments should be compelled to stop bailout to the finance capital, to implement employment creation programs by resorting to deficit financing and to restore and continue the welfare schemes. In India it is necessary to stop the indiscriminate invitation to FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) and FII(Foreign Institutional Investors) in the name of shortage of funds for developing the infrastructure. The primary source of funds for development should be Government financing which can be strengthened (a) by stopping the enormous concessions given in the budget to the big capitalists and (b) by deficit financing. 

3, డిసెంబర్ 2011, శనివారం

Assessment of The United Nations On World Economic Situation In 2012


The United Nations has put in its website a report “World Economic Situation and Prospects 2012” on global economic outlook for the year 2012. Following are some exerpts from this report:

“Following two years of anaemic and uneven recovery from the global financial crisis, the world economy is teetering on the brink of another major downturn.Output growth has already slowed considerably during 2011, especially in the developed countries.The baseline forecast foresees continued anaemic growth during 2012 and 2013. Such growth is far from sufficient to deal with the continued jobs crises in most developed economies and will drag income growth in developing countries.

Even this sombre outlook may be too optimistic. A serious, renewed global downturn is looming because of persistent weakness in the major developed economies related to problems left unresolved in the aftermath of the Great Recession of 2008-2009.

The problems stalking the global economy are multiple and interconnected. The most pressing challenges are the continued jobs crisis and the declining prospects for economic growth, especially in the developed countries. As unemployment remains high at nearly 10 per cent and incomes stagnate, the reecoveery is stalling in the short run because of the lack of aggregate demand. But as more and more workers are out of a job for a long period, especially young workers, medium term growth prospects also suffer because of the detrimental effect on workers’ skills and experience.

The rapidly cooling economy is both a cause and an effect of the sovereign debt crisis in the euro area, and of fiscal problems elsewhere. The sovereign debt crisis in a number of European countries worsened in the second half of 2011 and aggravated the weakness in the balance sheets of banks sitting on related assets. Eveen bold steps by the Governments of the euro area countries to reach an orderly sovereign debt workout for Greece were met with continued financial market turbulence and heightened concerns of debt default in some of the larger economies in the euro zone, in Italy in particular. The fiscal austerity measures taken in response are further weakening the growth and employment prospects, making fiscal adjustment and thee repair of financial sector balance sheets all the more challenging. The United States economy is also facing persistent high unemployment, shaken consumer and business confidence, and financial sector fragility. The European Union(EU) and the United States of America form the two largest economies in the world and they aree deeply intertwined. Their problems could easily feed into each other and spread to another global recession. Developing countries, which had rebounded strongly from the global recession of 2009, would be hit through trade and financial channels. The financial turmoil following the August 2011 political wrangling in thee United States regarding the debt ceiling and the deepening of the euro zone debt crisis also caused a contagious sell-off in equity markets in several major developing countries, leading to sudden withdrawls of capital and pressure on their currencies.”

“The economic woes in many developed economies are major factor behind the slowdown in developing economies. Economic growth in developed countries has already slowed to 1.3 percent in 2011, down from 2.7 per cent in 2010, and is expected to remain anaemic in the baseline outlook, at 1.3 per cent in 2-12 and 1.9 per cent in 2013. At this pace, output gaps are expected to remain significant and unemployment rates will stay high.”

Growth in the United States slowed notably in the first half of 2011. Despite a mild rebound in the third quarter of the year, gross domestic product(GDP) is expected to weaken further in 2012 and even a mild contraction is possible during part of the year under the baseline assumptions. While, if enacted in full, the American Jobs Act proposed by the Government could have provided some stimulus to job creation, but it would not have been sufficient to prevent further economic slowdown, as fiscal stimulus has already faded overall with many job losses caused by cuts in state level budgets. Even as the total public debt of the United States has risen to over 100 per cent of GDP, yields on long term Government bonds remained at record lows. This would make stronger fiscal stimulus affordable, but politically difficult to enact in a context where fiscal prudence is favoured and where the country has already been on thee verge of defaulting on its debt obligations in August 2011 because of a political deadlock over raising the ceiling on the level of federal public debt. Failure by the congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to reach agreement in November 2011 on fiscal consolidation plans for the medium teerm has further added to the uncerrtainity. The uncertain prospects are exaceerrbating the fragility of thee financial sector, causing lending to businesses and consumers to remain anaemic. Persistent high unemployment, at a rate of more than 9 per cent, and low wage growth are further holding back aggrregatee demand and, together with the prospect of prolonged depressed housing prices, have heightened risks of a new wavee of home foreclosures.

Growth in euro area ahd slowed down considerably since the beginning of 2011, and thee collapse in confidence evidenced by a wide variety of leading indicators and measures of economic sentiment suggest a further slowing ahead, perhaps to stagnation by the end of 2011 and to early 2012. Even under an optimistic assumption that the debt crises can be contained within a feew countries, growth is expected to be only marginally positive in the euro area in 2012, with the largest regional economies dangerously close to renewed downturns and the debt ridden economies in the periphery either in or very close to a protracted recession.
Japan was in another recession in the first half of 2011, caused largely, but not exclusively, by the disasters arising from the March earthquake. While post-quake reconstruction is expected to lift GDP growth in Japan to about 2 per cent, which is above its long-term trend, in the coming two years, risk remain on the down side, emanating from the challenges of financing thee reconstruction and coping with a possible, more pronounced and synchronized downturn along with other major developed economies.

As indicated above, developing countries are expected to be further affeecteed by the economic woes in developed countries through trade and financial channels. Among the major developing countries, GDP growth in China and India is expected to remain robust, but to decelerate. In China, growth slowed from 10.4 per cent in 2010 to 9.3 per cent in 2011 and is projected to slow further to below 9 per cent in 2012-2013. India’s economy is expected to expand by between 7.7 to 7.9 per cent in 2012-2013, down from 9.0 per cent in 2010. Brazil and Mexico are expected to suffer  more visible economic slowdowns. Output growth in Brazil was already halved, to 3.7 per cent, in 2011, after a strong recovery of 7.5 per cent in 2010, and is expected to cool further to a 2.7 percent growth in 2012.

Low income countries also have seen a slowdown, although a mild one. In per capita terms, income growth slowed from 3.8 per cent in 2010 to 3.5 per cent in 2011, but despite the global slowdown, the poorer countries may see average income growth at or slightly above this rate in 2012 and 2013. The same holds for average growth among the United Nations category of the least developed countries(LDCs). Nonetheless, growth is expected to remain below potential in most of these economies.”

“Threee years after the onset of the Great Recession, persistent high unemployment remains the Achilles heel of economic recovery in most developed countries. The unemployment rate averaged 8.6 per cent in developed countries, still well above the pree-crisis level of 5.8 per cent registered in 2007. At more than 20 per cent, the rate remains highest in Spain, while Norway’s jobless rate is thee lowest, at 3.5 per cent. Notably, the unemployment rate in the United States has remained over 9 per cent since 2009, with virtually no improvement in the labour market during 2011 as lay offs in thee public sector have partly offset job creation in the private seector and labour force growth has kept pace with overall employment growth.
In many developed economies, the actual situation is worse than reflected in the official unemployment rates. In the United States, for instance, labour participation rates have been on a steady decline since the start of the crisis. Increasing numbers of workers without a job for a prolonged period have stopped looking for one and are no longer counted as part of the labour force. About 29 per cent of the unemployed in the United States have been without a job for more than one year, up from 10 per cent in 2007. Such a prolonged duration of unemployment tends to have significant long-lasting detrimental impacts on both individuals who have lost their jobs and on the economy as a whole......The International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimated that by the frist quarter of 2011, almost one third of the unemployed in developed countries had been without a job for more than one year, the situation affecting 15 million workers.”

“In developing countries, employment recovery has been much stronger than in developed economies. For instance, unemployment rates are abck to or below pre-crisis levels in most Asian developing countries, while employment has recovered in most countries in Latin America also. However developing countries continue to face major challenges owing to high shares of workers that are unemployed, poorly paid, have vulnerable job conditions and lack of access to any form of social security. At the same time open unemployment rates remain high, at well over 10 per cent in urban areas, with the situation becoming particularly acute in a nymber of Afrrican and West Asian countries.”

“Meanwhile, more young people continue to enter labour markets worldwide. In order to restore pre-crisis employment and absorb the new labour entrants, an employment deficit, estimated at 64 million jobs in 2011, would need to be eliminated. With the global economic slowdown projected in the baseline and growth of the work force worldwide, however, the deficit would increase further, leaving a job shortage of about 71 million, of which 17 million would be in the developed countries. If economic growth stays as anaemic as in developed countries as projected in the baseline forecast, employment rates will not return to pre-crisis level until far beyond 2015.”

“Persistent unemployment is holding back wage growth and consumer demand aand, especially in the United States, pushing up delinquency on mortgage payments. Combined with continued financial fragility in the developed economies, it is also depressing investment demand and business confidence and further holding back economic recovery.”

“Failure of policy makers, especially those in Europe and the United States, to address the job crisis and prevent sovereign debt distress and financial sector fragility from escalating, poses the most acute risk for the global economy in the outlook for 2012-2013. A renewed global recession is just around the corner. The developed economies are on the brink of a downward spiral enacted by four weaknesses that mutually reinforce each other: sovereign debt distress, fragile banking sectors, weak aggregate demand(associated with high unemployment and fiscal austerity measures) and policy paralysis caused by political gridlock and institutional defficiencies. All of these weaknesses are already present, but a further worsening of one of theem could set off a vicious circle leading to seveerree financial turmoil and an economic downturn. This would also seriously affect the emerging markets and other developing countries through trade and financial channels.”

“A recession in either Europe or the United States alone may not induce a global recession, but a collapse of both economies most likely would.”

“Developing economies and thee economies in transition would likely to take a significant blow. ...Asian developing countries, particularly in East Asia, would suffer mainly through a drop in their exports to major developed economies, while those in Africa, latin America and Westeern Asia, along with the major economies in transition, would be effected by declining primary commodity prices. In addition, all emerging economies would have to cope with large financial shocks, including a contagious sell-off in their equity markets, reversal of capital inflows and direct financial losses due to the declining values of the holdings of European and United States sovereign bonds, which would both affect both official reserve holdings and private sector assets.”

“As a result, the GDP growth in developing countries would decelerate from 6.0 per cent in 2011 to 3.8 per cent in 2012, that is, to almost half the pace of growth(about 7 per cent per year) achieved during 2003-2007 and about 3 percentage points below the long teerm growth trend."

After thus detailing the dangerous world economic situation, the United Nation’s report suggested some solutions for coming out of this situation. About this, we will discuss tomorrow. 

2, డిసెంబర్ 2011, శుక్రవారం

Private Telecom Operators met Communications Minister, Prime Minister and other Ministers and Bureacrats



BSNL secured  3G spectrum for all the circles other than Delhi and Mumbai where it has no existence, by paying Rs 10186 crores. It is offering  3G services in all the circles other than Delhi and Mumbai.

MTNL secured 3G spectrum for Delhi and Mumbai by paying Rs 6564 crores. It is offering 3G services in Delhi and Mumbai.

Airtel secured 3G spectrum in 13 Circles including Delhi and Mumbai by paying Rs 12295 crores, but offering 3G services to its customers in 20 circles.

Vodafone secured 3G spectrum for 9 circles including Delhi and Mumbai by paying Rs Rs 11618 crores. But it is offering 3G services to its customers in 20 circles.

Idea secured 3G spectrum for 11 circles excluding Delhi and Mumbai by paying Rs 5769 crores. But it is offering 3G services to its customers in 19 circles.

Thus while the PSUs BSNL and MTNL are offering 3G services to their customers in the circles where they secured 3G spectrum by paying the due amount, the private operators Airtel, Viodafone and Idea are offering 3G services to their customers in several circles where they have not secured 3G spectrum.

This they are doing by sharing the 3G spectrum of the operator that is having it in the concerned circle. Suppose Airtel is not having 3G spectrum in a certain circle and Vodafone is having the 3G spectrum in that circle, it is sharing the spectrum of Vodafone and offering 3G services to its customers. This is called “Intra Circle Roaming” i.e a subscriber of a circle roaming within the same circle for 3G services. Airtel, Vodafone and Idea have signed such mutual intra circle roaming agreements among themselves and offering 3G services to their subscribers in the circles where they are not having 3G spectrum by sharing the 3G spectrum of the partner of the agreement having the 3G spectrum in those circles.

Thus Airtel avoided payment of 3G spectrum fees for 7 circles, Vodafone for 11 circles and Idea for 8 circles even though they are offering 3G services to their customers in those circles. The 3G spectrum fee thus they avoided to pay to the Government is estimated to be more than  Rs 20,000 crores. Thus this is a big scam and can be called as “3G spectrum scam”.

The TRAI, DoT and Law Ministry came to the conclusion that these intra circle roaming agreements of these 3 private operators are illegal and hence should be cancelled. As per the reports in the news papers, the DoT decided to issue notices to these 3 Operators for terminating their intra circle roaming agreements. But these 3 Operators came together and wrote a threatening letter to the Prime Minister demanding to give back the 3G spectrum fee paid by them with interest and also to compensate them for the expenditure incurred by them for the 3G network.

Instead of taking action against them, the Government started listening to them. On 30/11/2011 the Communications Minister Kapil Sibal called a meeting of all stake holders in telecom services sector at his residence. But here the word “stake holders” has to be understood as Private Operators only and not BSNL and MTNL since the PSUs are given step motherly treatment by the Government. The heads of these 3 Companies Sunil Mittal(Airtel), Vittorio Colao(Vodafone) and Aditya Birla(Idea)  along with Anil Ambani(Reliance) and Ishat Hussain representing Tata Teleservices attended this meeting.

This meeting was arranged to discuss the National Telecom Policy 2011, pricing of the excess 2G spectrum allotted to the private operators, the intra circle roaming agreements for 3G spectrum between Airtel, Vodafone and Idea as detailed above, “high penalties”(Rs 50 crores for violation) being collected from the telecom operators for violation of rules and licence conditions, financing to telecom operators by banks, issues related to mergers and acquisitions between telecom operators etc. After that they met the Prime Minister . They also met the Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, Commerce Minister Anand Sharma, Law Minister Salman Khurshid, DoT Secretary R.Chandrasekhar and TRAI Chairman J.S.Sarma.

  They have demanded lowering of license fee to 6%(at present it varies from 6 to 10%) on  revenue from services, exclusion of non-telecom revenue while calculating the licence fee on revenue,   treating the intra circle 3G spectrum agreements as legal (although it is against rules), not to limit the amount of spectrum in the allotment, government’s intervention to see that banks give loans to telecom operators (banks have stoppd giving loans to telecom operators after the 2G scam) etc. They demanded the Government to create confidence to the investors to invest in  telecom sector. They told that during last year, in the telecom sector, the foreign investment declined by 35% and the investment by leading operators declined by 50%. This means, to create confidence to the investors, the Government should act more in favour of the private telecom operators at the cost of exchequer and at the cost of the PSUs in telecom sector and Government should close its eyes against their irregularities.

It seems the Government is coming under their pressure. On 7th December, the India Telecom Summit meeting will be held, where the Prime Minister will address. In that address, he may reveal some of the views taken by the Government on the demands of the private telecom operators.

While the private operators are thus intensifying their lobbying and bringing pressure on the Government to settle their demands, the managements of BSNL and MTNL are not doing the same, except writing some letters requesting for certain concessions. Only the Unions and Associations of the Non-Executives and Executives are fighting the battle to save BSNL and MTNL. But to bring changes in the policies of the Government in favour of Public Sector and in favour of the people, a big struggle of the entire working class and the people is required. Until then, the struggles in a particular industry are necessary atleast to get some concessions.

1, డిసెంబర్ 2011, గురువారం

The Status Of the Economies of Various Countries


USA: As per the Federal Reserve Bank Official, the US economy grew by 1.3% in January-June 2011 and by 2% in July-September 2011. But this is not at all sufficient to tackle the 9% unemployment rate. The unemployment will remain painfully for many years.
Eurozone (17 countries of Europe-England, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Greece etc) The unemployment level reached all time high with 10.3% in October 2011. The Eurozone is falling towards a recession. The Eurozone is having 1.63 crores unemployed men and women in October 2011, an increase of 1,26,000 compared with September 2011. In Greece the unemployment rate is 18%. IMF predicted that Europe economy will grow by 1.2% this year and by 1.1% next year. Bank of France told Europe is facing a financial crisis.
Japan Growth rate in July-September 2011 was 1.5%.
Russia  GDP grew by 0.2% in April-June 2011 compared to January-March 2011.
India The growth this financial year(April 2011 to March 2012) will be 7.0 or 7.1% against the expected 9%. The economy is slowing down. The growth rate in July-September came down to 6.9%, the lowest in the last  9 quarters. (October-Dec 2009=7.3%, Jan-Mar 2010=9.4%, Apr-Jun 2010=9.3%, Jul-Sep 2010=8.9%, Oct-Dec 2010=8.3%, Jan-Mar 2011=7.4%,  Apr-Jun 2011=7.8%, and Jul-Oct 2011=6.9%).
China China economy grew by 9.1% in July-September 2011, whereas it grew by 9.5% in April-June 2011 and by 9.7% in January-March 2011.
But it is to be noted that the economies of USA, is  far bigger than that of India. In 2010, the GDP(Gross Domestic Product in  USA was 14 trillion dollars where as it was 3.3. trillion dollars in Germany, 2.5 trillion dollars in France, 2.2 trillion dollars in England, 2.1 dollars in Italy, 2.09 trillion dollars in Brazil, and 1.6 dollars in India. However it was  6 trillions dollars  in China  and 5 trillions dollars   in  Japan. It was 1.5 trillion dollars in Russia.  The per capita GDP in 2010 was 46860 dollars in USA, 36081 dollars in Germany, 35059 dollars in England, 33910 dollars in France, 15612 dollars in Russia, 11273 dollars in Brazil, 7544 dollars in China, and 3408 dollars in India, in 2010. While the USA has not yet come out fully from the effects of the recession, the Eurozone is again on the verge of recession. Comparatively, China and India are having a better growth rates. It is because they are not very much effected by the world economic recession since they are having Public sector in a considerably large proportion in the economy. Still, their economies also facing problems due to the slowdown in USA and crisis like situation in Eurozone.
 India is the 9th biggest economy in the world after USA,China, Japan,Germany, France, England, Brazil, and Italy. Hence the foreign giant retail traders, pension fund companies, insurance companies  of USA, England, France, Germany etc whose markets are saturated and not growing due to the effect of the recession, want to have a big presence in India to exploit its market and its people. But Manmohan Singh the Prime Minister says India has to invite FDIs(Foreign Direct Investment) in a big way in retail, pemnsion, insurance, banking, and infrastructure sectors in order to solve this problem of slow down in the growth rate. Although such liberalisation policies and reforms resulted in recession in USA and Europe, the same destructive policies are being implemented by the UPA Government in a big way. It will result in further problems to the people of India.