One Full by BJP and another full by Congress
The BJP lead NDA Government has allowed 100% FDI in telecom
manufacture sector in automatic route, in the year 2000. Now, on 16.7.2013, the Congress lead UPA-II
Government has decided to hike FDI ceiling from 74% to 100% in telecom services
companies. In this, it can come in automatic route up to 49% and beyond that,
the approval of FIPB (Foreign Investment Promotion Board) is necessary. This decision taken by a group of Ministers
Chaired by the Prime Minister was subsequently approved by the Cabinet on
01.08.2013. (Earlier, on 3.11.2005, the UPA Government has hiked the FDI
ceiling in telecom services from 49% to 74 %.)
Thus, courtesy the NDA and UPA, doors are kept wide open for
allowing foreign companies to have their telecom equipment manufacturing
companies and telecom services companies in India, without Indian partner.
Misleading Arguments
The Communications Minister Mr.
Kapil Sibal has stated that in the next 5 years, Rs 5, 00,000 crores funds are
required for the development of telecom sector and since that much money is not
available, it has become necessary to encourage FDI by hiking the ceiling limit
to 100%. He also stated that allowing 100% FDI in telecom services will not
create any security risk and the security risk arises due to imported telecom
equipment and Government is going to take care of it. Hiking FDI ceiling is
also supported by arguing that it will bring in new technology and help us to
develop our own technology. These justifications are all stories for misleading
the people.
Less gain but heavy loss
The amount of FDI that entered
our telecom sector including equipment manufacture and services during the last
12 years from April 2000 to December 2012 was Rs 57585 crores only (Source: DoT
web site). This was in spite of 100% FDI limit in manufacture and raising the
ceiling limit in services to 74% in November 2005 itself. When this is the hard
fact, how in the coming 5 years FDI will come in such a large quantity for
mobilizing the Rs 5, 00,000 crores?
In
spite of allowing 100% FDI in telecom equipment manufacture long ago, our
country is mostly depending on imports. As per the report of the TRAI, in the
value of the equipment utilized for the expansion of our telecom networks, 89%
is being paid for imports and only 11% is created in our country. While our
country has received Rs 57585 crores only as FDI in telecom sector during the
period April 2000 to December 2012, an astronomical amount of Rs 3, 11,714
crores was paid for importing the telecom equipment during the period April 2004 to December 2012 (Source: TRAI web site and
replies given by the Government in Loksabha and Rajyasabha). Thus it is proved that 100% FDI will not
automatically result in any real development and on the other hand, it is
resulting in the draining out of our resources to other countries.
Threat to Security
The Home Ministry has warned that
expanding our telecom networks with imported equipment will result in danger to
the security of the customers, services and the country. There is every chance
that in the equipment imported from the foreign countries, codes may be
embedded in the software/hardware /firmware and through the codes, when
required, the information passing through the network can be known and also the
functioning of the network itself can be disrupted at critical times. Hence the
Home Ministry recommended that the percentage of the equipment manufactured
domestically should be increased in a phased manner. Accordingly, on 5.12.2012,
the DoT (Department of Telecom) issued an order directing the PSU operators
BSNL, MTNL and Government Departments to increase the utilization of
domestically manufactured equipment in their networks in a phased manner. It
also issued draft guide lines (not a final order) for private telecom operators
proposing the same policy for them, only for 14 types of security sensitive equipments.
It is to be noted that the Home Ministry has highlighted the fact that the US
and China rely “entirely on indigenous capacity to meet their requirement of
sensitive gear and embedded systems” (The Economic Times, May 24, 2013).
Surrendering the Security
Interest
But the USIBC(United States-India Business
Council, representing 400 big companies in America and India with its headquarters in
Washington), ITIC(Information Technology Industry Council, a Washington based
organization consisting of members like Microsoft, Motorola, Alcatel-Lucent,
Qualcomm, Apple, Adobe, Cognizant, Google, Sony etc), the TIA(Telecom Industry
Association of America), the COAI(Cellular Operators Association of India
representing the private sector mobile services companies ) and several other
organizations representing the big Corporates have brought pressure on the
PMO(Prime Minister’s Office) against this PMA(Preferential Market Access) for
domestically manufactured equipment. They argued that such imposition of PMA on
private sector is against the WTO (World Trade Organization) agreement signed
by India. Coming under this pressure, the Prime Minister’s Office has issued a statement
( this can be seen in the web page http://pmindia.nic.in/press-details.php?nodeid=1660) on 8.7.2013 that
these guidelines for preference to domestic equipment are applicable only for
the PSUs BSNL, MTNL, BBNL and Government
procurement and not for the private telecom operators(Airtel, Vodafone, Idea
etc). Moreover, the Prime Minister has directed the Secretariat of the National
Security Council to redefine “Security” so that it will not trouble the private
operators and foreign equipment manufacturers. He has further directed the DeiTy
(Department of Information Technology) to submit revised proposal on PMA before
8.8.2013 for the approval of the Cabinet, without out insisting the private
telecom services operators for procuring domestically manufactured equipment!
This means the PMA will be applicable only for the Public Sector Operators BSNL
, MTNL, BBNL etc.
Protesting against this holding back
of the PMA for domestically manufactured telecom equipment in the case of the
private telecom operators, the Telecom equipment Manufacturers Association of India
(TEMA) has written a letter to the Prime Minister. It has categorically
mentioned the following facts:
1. The applicability of PMA for
the private operators was earlier cleared by the Cabinet under the Chairmanship
of the Prime Minister himself and after great scrutiny at various levels in
DoT, DeiTy, NMCC (National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council), Commerce
Ministry, Planning Commission etc
2. Even according to the WTO rules, Governments can implement PMA
for domestic manufacture for its own procurement as well as for security
related purposes. Hence directing the private telecom operators to procure
security sensitive telecom equipment from domestic manufacturers is not a
violation of WTO rules.
3. Even USA and advanced
countries have policies favoring domestic manufacturers and WTO has nowhere
said that the signatories should explicitly delink manufacture and security. Indeed,
WTO leaves the signatories to address security concerns through appropriate
buying decisions.
But it is clear that the Prime
Minister is not caring for all these security related objections and preference
for domestic manufacture. It is because the combination of the big capitalists
in India and America and other advanced countries want unhindered access to
exploit Indian market in all sectors including the strategically sensitive
telecom market. Accordingly, an inter
ministerial meeting held on 25.7.2013 has decided to drop the applicability of
PMA for the private operators and made it applicable only for the Public Sector
companies like BSNL, MTNL etc. Not only this. As detailed in this article at
another place, they want to exploit jointly even the security of India in
telecom sector.
Present level of FDI
What can be the result of this
100% FDI? At present the FDI in various telecom services companies is as below:
- Vodafone-FDI 74% belonging to Vodafone, a British Company; remaining 26% Indian capital in which 11% belongs to the Piramal Group and 13% to Analjit Sing and IDFC.
- Aircel—FDI 74 %( belonging to Maxis, a Singapore Company); Remaining 26% Indian capital belonging to Apollo Hospitals Group.
- Uninor (Telewings communications Ltd) —FDI 74 %( of Telenor, a Norway Company) and the remaining 24% Indian capital belonging to Sun Pharma.
- Sistema Shyam (MTS)—FDI 73.82%, in this 56.68% belongs to Sistema (Russia) and 17.14% of Russian Government; in the remaining 26.18% Indian capital, Shyam Group has 24%.
- Bharti Airtel---FDI 37.25%; In this, SingTel of Singapore 32.25% and Qatar Endowment foundation of Qatar 5%; Most of the remaining 62.75% Indian capital belongs to Bharti Group.
- Idea Cellular—FDI 20.98%(Axiata of Malaysia); In the remaining Indian capital, 45.88% belongs to Aditya Birla Group
- Reliance Communications—There is almost no FDI; 68.90% belongs to Anil Ambani Group
- Tata Teleservices—FDI-26% of Do Co Mo(Japan); Remaining Indian capital of Tata Group and others( As per the news paper reports, the Russian company Sistema is trying to acquire the 26% stake of Do Co Mo and also something from Tatas to become major share holder in it)
- BSNL—100% owned by Government of India
- MTNL-58.67% held by Government of India and the remaining Indian share holders
More Concessions
The foreign partners in the
telecom services companies have demanded for hiking the ceiling limit of FDI to
100% so that they can have fully owned companies in India. The domestic
promoters/partners of the telecom services companies want to sell their stake
in part or in full to reduce their debt burden and hence they have demanded for
increasing the FDI ceiling limit to 100%. But they are not simply for raising
the FDI ceiling. They demanded more concessions. Accordingly, several other
concessions are being showered on the private sector telecom companies. The
Mergers and Acquisitions guidelines are going to be announced by 15th
September 2013 to convince the foreign and Indian partners that they can easily
merge or acquire to become bigger. It is
reported in the newspapers that as per these new guidelines, the merged company
can have 35% of the market (35% of the total customers) without any permission
and up to 60% with the permission of the TRAI. Government is in favor of
reducing the base price of the spectrum and the DoT has already asked the TRAI
to consider this. TRAI Chairman Mr. Rahul Khullar already has given the statement
that the price of the spectrum has to be reviewed. It is negotiating with Vodafone to reduce the
Rs 11200 crore tax it has to pay. It is
also negotiating with the private operators for reducing the Rs 20,000 crores
penalties they have to pay for violating the license conditions. In fact, the
Communications Minister Mr. Kapil Sibal himself has stated that the DoT is
imposing huge penalties on the telecom operators and hence the Government is
proposing to transfer the responsibility of imposing penalties, from DoT to
TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India).
What will happen with all these concessions along with increasing FDI
limit to 100%?
Leading to Foreign Domination
As per the TRAI statistics, the
following is the market share (number of wire line and wireless customers a
company has, compared with the total number of customers) of various telecom
operators as on 30.4.2013:
- Bharti Airtel=21.78%
- Vodafone=17.74%
- Reliance Communications=14.27%
- Idea=14.17%
- BSNL=11.42%
- Tata Teleservices=7.57%
- Aircel=6.93%
- Unitech(Uninor)=3.67%
- Sistema Shyam(MTS)=1.16%
- MTNL=0.56%
- Loop=0.34%
- Videocon=0.25%
- Quadrant=0.16%
Due to raising the FDI ceiling to
100% and liberalizing the Mergers and Acquisitions and giving other
concessions, the big companies can acquire small companies or two big companies
can merge or the foreign partner in a Company can acquire the shares of the
Indian partner partly or fully. By purchasing the remaining 26% Indian stake, Companies
like Vodafone, Systema, and Telenor can become 100% foreign owned companies.
The foreign stake can be increased in Airtel, Idea, Tata Teleservices etc so that they become
foreign dominated companies. Due to these mergers and acquisitions, out of the
above 13 companies, only 5 or 6 may remain in the field. As a result, the
market share of some companies will increase largely and it will be difficult
for the PSUs BSNL and MTNL to compete with them and their market share may
further get reduced. Added to this, the condition of procuring domestic
equipment for expanding their networks is imposed on these PSUs while imposing
no such condition on private sector operators, thus putting the PSUs in a
disadvantage. This will make the condition of BSNL and MTNL which are in losses
since 2009-10, much worse.
Allowing 100% FDI in telecom
equipment manufacturer has resulted in the destruction of our domestic
manufacture and our domestic R&D(Research and Development). The ITI, the
premier PSU manufacturing telecom equipment has been in losses since 2003. The
cable manufacturing PSU, the HCL has been in losses since 1993. In the weak
telecom equipment manufacture sector in our country, the major manufacturers
are foreign companies who established their plants here like Nokia, Ericsson,
Siemens, ZTE, Huwaei, Motorola etc. Both the foreign as well as domestic
manufacturers making equipment in India are mostly assembling the imported
parts without developing their own technology. Thus we lost our self reliance
due to 100% FDI in telecom equipment manufacture.
In the same way, due to this
raising of FDI ceiling to 100% in the telecom services, the BSNL and MTNL which
are the telecom services PSUs will face more difficulties and losses and their
market share will be further reduced from the present 11.98%. Thus, in the
telecom services sector also, more than 90% of the market will be controlled by
entirely foreign owned or foreign dominated companies.
The preaching and practice of
America
Telecom networks built with
foreign made equipment, foreign telecom companies operating these networks,
emaciated domestic telecom equipment manufacture-this is the result of these
policies. Will this not be a threat to our security? Manmohan Singh Government
says it is not a threat. But what the America, which is pressuring India to
implement these policies, is doing in its own country? It has not allowed 100%
FDI in telecom. As per the section 310 of thee Communications Act of America,
in case the Government considers that the FDI beyond 25%in any telecom Company
is against the interests of the country, permission can be denied for it.
Recently, the House Committee of America (Committee of its Parliament) has
warned that in the security interest of the country, it is better not to have
business with the Chinese equipment manufacturing companies ZTE and Huwaei. But
the Chinese Companies are stating that the House Committee is doing this with
an intention to damage their business. When the America having a far higher
technology than us in telecom sector is imposing such conditions on foreign
equipment and foreign companies, why our Government is allowing the expansion
of our telecom network with imported equipment and why it is allowing 100% FDI
in telecom services? Even after the opinion of the Home Ministry that allowing
100% FDI in telecom services is not desirable from security angle, why it is
being allowed?
Big Brother spying on all
In America all the telecom and IT
companies like AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Spike, Pal
talk etc are secretly supplying the information to the American Government’s
security agencies regarding the details
of the telephonic conversations and information seen in/sent through internet,
by the people in all countries and also by the American people. They are
providing information of the people and organizations of other countries to the
NSA (National Security Agency) of America. Not only this. Even in India also,
the private telecom operators Reliance Communications and Tata (VSNL) have
signed agreements as per which the US Government agencies can monitor any
communication that is flowing through their optic cables, as the one end of
their networks is in US and the information they thus supply to the US agencies
cannot be disclosed to the Indian Government and even to the
management/Directors of these companies!
Threat to Cyber Security From
America and its allies
It is also to be noted that the investigation
carried out by the Russian anti-virus Company KASPARSKY Lab as per the request
of the ITU (International Telecom Union, an organization of United Nations) has
revealed that the Iranian Oil installations which were kept on line were
infected by a virus which was created, possibly by America and Israel! Similarly,
investigations revealed that the Iran’s nuclear fuel facility at Natanz was
targeted by two viruses Stuxnet and Duqu and these were created by US! Thus the US is
the real threat to the world regarding security in internet and telecom. The
famous newspapers O Globo (Brazil) and Der Spiegel (Germany)
have revealed how the telecom networks of Brazil and Germany were hacked with
the help of American Companies. Just like Reliance and Tata, the US has
agreements with more than 80 foreign telecom companies to provide access to
their optic fiber networks. Under these agreements, the US can monitor any
communication flowing through all these networks. To cover up this, like a thief shouting at
others as thief, the US is campaigning that China is spying the telecom and
internet networks of all countries! While the threat from China may be
possible, the threat from the USA security agency NSA etc is well documented
and proved. Edward Snowden has revealed that US agencies are regularly spying
the networks of all countries including China. The NSA routinely vacuums up all
the data that passes through the global fibre optic cable network and stores it
on its servers. In this it is aided by the telecom companies of USA, the GCHQ
of UK—UK’s equivalent of NSA—and to our shame, Indian private telecom operators
like Reliance Communications and Tata Teleservices. If 100% foreign owned
telecom services are allowed, it will further increase the threat to our
security in telecom sector.
Dependence even in the
Security
But our Government is not
bothered about the fact that the privacy of our citizens is compromised by the
NSA of America. Instead, it also wants similar powers! Under its licensing
powers it is asking all Indian telecom companies to provide access to their
networks, for siphoning off as much data as it wants and also to know in real
time regarding who is talking to whom, from where and for how long. The Indian
Government wants that its security agencies should have equal opportunity like
NSA of America to spy on our citizens and hence the data supplied by the
telecom companies as well as internet companies like Google, Face book, Yahoo
etc should be supplied to it also. Thus in effect, Indian Government wants to
allow foreign companies as strategic partners in security matters! Our National
Security Advisor Sri Shiv Shankar Menon has been saying about the need to have
partnerships with other countries, means the US-to address our intelligence
needs. This means we need US and other foreign companies to snoop on our
citizens. (The contents in this Para and
the previous two Paras are based on the article “The New Strategic Mantra:
Indian Cyber Security Needs Foreign Help”, by Prabir Purkayastha, published in Peoples’
Democracy, July 28, 2013).
Congress, BJP and Regional
Parties
Hence it is not surprising that
the UPA Government has decided to allow 100% FDI in telecom services, since it
wants to have US and foreign Companies as the strategic partners in the
security of telecom and internet (cyber security) and also in Defense! But it
is to be noted that the principal opposition party in the parliament, the BJP,
is also sailing in the same boat. They also want America as strategic partner
in the security of the nation. In fact, the strategic alliance in security
matters with America was started by the Vajpayee Government. The “Swadeshi” of
BJP is confined to create hatred against Muslims while crawling before the US
imperialism. The regional parties also are working with a pro-capitalist view
and hence not opposing these policies. These parties (Congress, BJP and
regional parties) are the parties representing the indigenous capitalist
classes who are increasingly collaborating with the foreign capitalists in
their hunt for profits in our country as well as in other countries. Hence they
are not opposing these policies, even though they are against the interest of
the people and the security of the country.
Liberalization leading to
destruction and dependence
It is clear that allowing foreign domination
in our telecom network installation and in our telecom services will be
dangerous to our security. Besides the security, these policies are destroying
our self reliance and compelling us to pay lakhs of crores of rupees for
importing equipment. Due to these policies, our indigenous telecom equipment
manufacture and indigenous Research and Development in telecom technology is
being destroyed. Our telecom services sector is coming under foreign
domination. The telecom equipment manufacturing PSUs ITI and HCL have become
sick. The telecom services PSUs BSNL and MTNL are in losses since 2009-10. The
number of regular employees in telecom sector is decreasing and the number of
temporary/casual/contract workers is increasing. The foreign and Indian private
telecom companies have been pressurizing the Government to cut the rights of
the workers and employees. Proposals are being made and considered by the
Government for reducing the staff in BSNL and MTNL in large number in the name
of VRS and also, efforts are being made to fragment BSNL and MTNL in order to
prepare them for privatization.
The Experience of China and
the Necessity for the Alternative
Therefore it is necessary to
propose alternative policies countering these bankrupt liberalization policies
and to organize a big movement to pressurize the Government for implementing
such alternative policies.
The experience of China is
noteworthy in this regard. The Prime Minister of India has appointed a Group
headed by Sri V.Krishna Murthy, Chairman of the NMCC (National Manufacture
Competitive Council) to study and make recommendations for ensuring sustained
growth of manufacture in India. This Group has submitted its report on
20.9.2008. In this report it observed that China has achieved spectacular
growth in manufacture by adopting “an industrial policy including FDI policy
which promoted domestic manufacturing growth….China also has put in place
policies in respect of the FDI which helped in the growth of domestic companies
including technology transfer. For example, absorption of technology by local
company, minimum capital requirement, local participation in the companies etc.,
are prescribed to ensure that the manufacturing along with technology is
transferred to China.”
In China, all the telecom
services companies are PSUs. By keeping the telecom services market in its
hands, the China Government was able to compel the foreign telecom equipment
manufacturing companies to invest in China with a Chinese partner and transfer
their technology to the Chinese partner. The technology thus acquired was
further developed. On this basis, it was able to develop its own telecom
equipment manufacture industry. Today, the Chinese telecom equipment
manufacturing Companies ZTE and Huwaei have become world famous, supplying
their equipment to all countries in competition with Nokia, Motorola, Siemens,
Ericsson, Samsung etc. In India, while the BJP lead NDA Government allowed 100%
FDI in telecom equipment manufacture in automatic route without insisting for
transferring their technology to our companies for further development,
thereafter, the Congress lead UPA Government has continued the same policy and
further decided to allow 100% FDI in services sector also, making our country
depending on imports for equipment to expand our telecom networks and handing
over our telecom services to foreign domination.
FDI is required to some extent
for acquiring and developing higher technology, for providing more jobs and for
developing our indigenous industries. Only to this extent it has to be
utilized. But it should not be allowed to damage our security, self reliance
and our industries, our technological development and our employment. It is
necessary to encourage our domestic R&D(Research and Development) in
telecom technology, our indigenous equipment manufacturing companies and our
indigenous telecom services companies. For this, it is necessary to encourage
the Public Sector R&D, manufacture and services organizations C-DoT, ITI,
HCL, BSNL, MTNL and BBNL (Bharat Broadband Network Limited). It is also
necessary to see that our country comes out of the poisonous strategic alliance
with US in the security and defense related issues. The trade unions, the mass
organizations of the people, the Left and Democratic forces have to organize
this struggle for the alternative.
---P.Asokababu